Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
+(x, +(y, z)) → +(+(x, y), z)
+(*(x, y), +(x, z)) → *(x, +(y, z))
+(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
Q is empty.
↳ QTRS
↳ DirectTerminationProof
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
+(x, +(y, z)) → +(+(x, y), z)
+(*(x, y), +(x, z)) → *(x, +(y, z))
+(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
Q is empty.
We use [23] with the following order to prove termination.
Recursive path order with status [2].
Precedence:
+2 > *2
Status:
+2: [2,1]
*2: multiset